Saturday, April 15, 2017

Utilitarianism in Dickens' "Hard Times"



Dickens’ Hard Times may largely be read as a criticism of the utilitarianism system.  In Dickens’ illustration of utilitarianism, facts are more important than people and the human element has been removed from all aspects of life.  Children in school are addressed by numbers rather than names and workers in factories are called “hands,” implying that nothing else is necessary.  Utilitarianism means functionality.  There is no room for beauty or sentiment. 

How did the world end up like this?

Utilitarianism was invented by Jeremy Bentham, and was possibly the most important philosophical system of the nineteenth century.  Utilitarianism was responsible for many changes in criminal law, judicial organization, and social reform (Smith 133).  Utilitarianism, at first, was intended to improve social conditions. 

The main point of Bentham’s utilitarianism was to reduce decision-making to a form of mathematics.  The profits, advantages, benefits, conveniences, and happiness gained from an action would be weighed against the disadvantage, inconvenience, loss, or unhappiness that may also result (Everett). 

The ultimate test question in determining the value of a decision became “What is the use of it?” 
At some point, happiness fell out of the equation.  Utilitarianism became practicality, usefulness, and profit above all else.  Anything not aimed at profit, practicality, or usefulness, such as children’s fairy stories, decorated wallpaper, imagination or love, were to be stamped out.  These are not useful.  Get rid of them. 

But, Dickens book asks, what does that do to people? 

Louisa Gradgrind needed a father’s love.  She needed to be able to confide in her father, and to ask him for advice.  But Thomas Gradgrind’s eminent practicality had built an impassible wall between him and the rest of humanity.  

Love, imagination, sentiment, and all the rest of “those subtle essences of humanity” cannot be measured even by the most sophisticated of mathematics.   Not ever.  Not until the last trumpet sounds and blows algebra to pieces (Dickens 74). 

But Louisa can’t wait that long!

Gradgrind had done a good job in imparting his eminently practical ways to his children.  Louisa turned her back on sentiment.  What was the use of it?  She married a man she did not love.  It was, after all, the practical thing to do.  What could go wrong?

Works Cited
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. New York: Dover, 2001. Print.
Everett, Glenn.  “Utilitarianism.” The Victorian Web. 11 Oct. 2002. Accessed 11 Apr. 2017. Web. http://victorianweb.org/philosophy/phil1.html
Smith, Grahame. Charles Dickens: A Literary Life. New York: Palgrave, 1996.  Print. 

Tuesday, March 28, 2017

The Golden Fiddle



The screech of a violin fills the air, effectively silencing the discordant background noise.  A reddish glow spreads across the horizon.  The approaching flickering light casts twisting shadows as the musician sways maniacally from side to side in time with the music of his own creation.  He takes no notice of the increasing temperature and plays on with greater passion.  The world will soon be rebuilt in his image.  Rome is burning.  We are all Nero.

The contemplation of this disturbing image is the main objective of poem XXXV in Emily Johnston’s Her Animals.  Perhaps this is an important objective of the entire book.  Johnston’s Her Animals, perhaps a poetry collection, perhaps an essay on the impending destruction of mankind, offers a very bleak picture of our future.  Even darker is the portrayal of human society, and our exploitive relationship with the earth. 

Nero’s “golden fiddle” is ever present in our lives, appearing on all our screens, and taking a position of leadership at the podium (Johnston XXXV).  The sound is our contented distraction.  “It drowns out the wailing; it drowns out the cries; it drowns out the drilling and clear-cutting…” Johnston writes (XXXV).  Our contented distraction comes at a price.  Our lifestyle is supported by the destruction of the earth, the using up of limited resources. 

This is not all.  Our contented distraction “drowns out the heartbeats silenced: the chirrups, the hums, the rustles, the snuffles, the squeaks” (XXXV).  How many species are on the endangered list?  How many will go extinct this year?  All to support a few more years of our contented distraction.

Is our downfall inevitable?  What can we really do? Recycle, conserve water and power, drive less, hug a tree…  All small steps.  Of course, we must start somewhere.  Give up our car, move to a cabin in the woods, go off the grid… Bigger steps, but not always practical or possible for the modern person.  Does it really make a difference?  Perhaps if everyone made even a few small changes.  But they are too busy being contentedly distracted.  What can we really do?  How do we wake people up and get them to join in?  Tell our friends, join environmental groups, march on Washington, write a letter to the Times, call people names, shout until we lose our voices…  Rome is already on fire.  Time is running out. 




Works Cited
Johnston, Emily. Her Animals. Seattle: Hummingbird Press, 2015. Print.

Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Stolen Eggs


            Curious visitors gawk at a magnificent collection of eggs sitting carefully arranged on a bed of cotton.  Large and small, spotted, striped, pink, white, and brown, these sphere-like canvasses are all unique and extraordinarily beautiful works of art.  But today is not Easter.  There are no rabbits here.  And no birds.  This artistic collection is displayed at the Museum of Natural History; nature was the artist.  This unnatural collection is not unusual.  Every year, millions of visitors swarm to museums across the country to gratify their curiosity.  Only a few, perhaps, notice that something is not right.

            In Refuge, the emptiness of the situation becomes painfully obvious to Terry Tempest-Williams.  These eggs on display are hollow and weightless.  The life has been blown out of them (Tempest-Williams, 262).  The eggs have been preserved for the purpose of education, but the life in them was destroyed in the process.  The life that those eggs held could have populated an entire marsh.  Now they sit arranged in rows, removed from nature, a lifeless and pointless demonstration of where birds come from. 




            The destruction of life is enraging to Tempest.  But so is the theft.  These eggs were stolen not just from nature, but from the warm nest of a mother bird.  These eggs had been guarded like secrets, the protective mother sheltering them with her feathers.  Eggs are not meant to be seen, and this collection amounts to sacrilege (Tempest-Williams, 262). 




            This conclusion was a bit surprising to me, I must admit.  As a history major, museums are not foreign to me.  They preserve the past for the sake of education.  For the benefit of current and future generations.  Perhaps for entertainment too.  Education does not have to be boring.  And if even one visitor gains a greater respect for the natural world, has the museum’s purpose been fulfilled? 




Really, what is so bad about looking at eggs?  While pondering this question, it was a funny surprise that one of my duolingo sentences for the day just happened to be “Wir sehen jedes Ei.”   We see every egg.  Looking at eggs is probably something that most people do fairly regularly.  Perhaps you ate some with your breakfast this morning?  I know I have about half a dozen in my refrigerator at this very moment.  A lot of you probably do too.  Were these eggs stolen?  No baby chick would ever have hatched from them.  Hens were removed from nature to serve our purposes. 




            The examination of stealing from nature is not limited to the work of Tempest.  The poetry of Emily Dickenson also contains this theme.  In Dickenson’s poem, “Who Robbed the Woods,” the woods, like a trusting child, proudly displays burrs and mosses to impress a visitor.  The visitor betrayed this trust and took what belonged to the woods, snatching it greedily and carrying away.  The poem positions the reader to sympathize with the forest, to share in the speechless outrage expressed by the fir and hemlock.  The childlike innocence is contrasted with the grasping curiosity and shocking robbery perpetrated by the unnamed male thief.




But what is the harm of taking a few burrs and mosses, or an egg or two?  Especially in the name of science?  The thief in Dickenson’s poem was curious about nature.  Perhaps he simply admired the beauty of nature.  Perhaps he did not know that he had offended the trees.  Perhaps he truly did not intend any harm.  Perhaps he, like visitors to museums of natural history, only wanted to learn.  The museum administration, too, surely does not intend harm in collecting artifacts to exhibit.  They more likely see their work as a boon to civilization.




But if collecting museum artifacts is harming nature, then why is it done?  What is the purpose of museums?  Does the education of millions of museum visitors justify destroying even one egg?  Does the end ever justify the means?




Humans are creatures of curiosity.  We want to know how things work, where things come from, and why things are the way they are.  Institutions of education, libraries, museums, self-help books, and a large number of google searches stand as monuments to human curiosity.  Still, nature holds mystery.  We want to discover the answers, so we examine nature, put it under microscopes, and display it in museums.  Eggs, in particular, symbolize the origin of life.  No matter how disconnected from nature humans may become, we share life with nature.  The mystery of life will always intrigue us, tug at the corners of our consciousness, worm its way into our thoughts every time a new green stem pushes its way out of the still half-frozen ground, and pull at our hearts every time we hear a baby cry.  We will always grasp for answers. 




Still, the disconnect between humans and nature remains.  The visitors to museums, like the visitor in Dickenson’s poem, were curious.  But they often do not understand the full implications of their actions.  They admire the beauty of nature, but they do not fully appreciate the tenderness and fragility of the natural world.  Nature, like a small child, should be cared for.  In the appreciation of nature, is not enough simply to visit a museum once in a blue moon while our hearts and our lifestyles remain unchanged.




Dickenson’s poem, like Tempest-Williams’ Refuge, promotes a respect and reverence for nature, as a sentient, living entity.  Nature’s beauty, even to the small curious details, the eggs, the burrs, the moss, the pinecones, should be respected as belonging to nature.  When interacting with nature, as well as with our fellow humans as we go about our ordinary daily lives, it is important to remember that even our smallest actions can have significant effects.

There is undoubtedly a place for museums in our world today.  That is, as long as these museums are conducted as institutions of preservation and education rather than as storehouses for plunder.  Hopefully, the artifacts on display are collected responsibly, with as little harm as possible.  If not, then let them serve as reminders of humanity’s potential for destruction.  True education entails a shift in thought.  This, no matter how much people resist it, means change.  If people fully understand the destruction they cause by their everyday actions, would they continue to make the same harmful decisions? 


Go visit a museum, but please do so with a willingness to learn.  Remember, too, that the world’s greatest museum is right outside your door.  This is the season of miracles, the time when life is renewed.  On my way home yesterday, I noticed that the tulips had started pushing their way through the melting snow.  Take a moment to celebrate the triumph of a few brave tulips.  Listen to the birds sing, too.  It has been pretty quiet all winter without them.  Even in the city, it is still possible to find the touch of nature.  Those trees that grow between the sidewalk and the street often hide birds’ nests.  Take a quick peek sometime, but do be respectful.  These outdoor museum exhibits are the real thing, in their natural state, not empty and lifeless like those that Tempest held and mourned over.  Here, the mother bird sits warming future generations.  Under her feathers, she guards the secret of life. 
 
Works Cited
Dickenson, Emily.  “Who Robbed the Woods.” Bartleby.com.
Tempest-Williams, Terry.  Refuge. New York: Pantheon Books, 1991.