Dickens’
Hard Times may largely be read as a
criticism of the utilitarianism system.
In Dickens’ illustration of utilitarianism, facts are more important
than people and the human element has been removed from all aspects of life. Children in school are addressed by numbers
rather than names and workers in factories are called “hands,” implying that
nothing else is necessary.
Utilitarianism means functionality.
There is no room for beauty or sentiment.
How
did the world end up like this?
Utilitarianism
was invented by Jeremy Bentham, and was possibly the most important
philosophical system of the nineteenth century.
Utilitarianism was responsible for many changes in criminal law,
judicial organization, and social reform (Smith 133). Utilitarianism, at first, was intended to
improve social conditions.
The
main point of Bentham’s utilitarianism was to reduce decision-making to a form
of mathematics. The profits, advantages,
benefits, conveniences, and happiness gained from an action would be weighed
against the disadvantage, inconvenience, loss, or unhappiness that may also
result (Everett).
The
ultimate test question in determining the value of a decision became “What is
the use of it?”
At
some point, happiness fell out of the equation.
Utilitarianism became practicality, usefulness, and profit above all
else. Anything not aimed at profit,
practicality, or usefulness, such as children’s fairy stories, decorated
wallpaper, imagination or love, were to be stamped out. These are not useful. Get rid of them.
But,
Dickens book asks, what does that do to people?
Louisa
Gradgrind needed a father’s love. She
needed to be able to confide in her father, and to ask him for advice. But Thomas Gradgrind’s eminent practicality
had built an impassible wall between him and the rest of humanity.
Love,
imagination, sentiment, and all the rest of “those subtle essences of humanity”
cannot be measured even by the most sophisticated of mathematics. Not
ever. Not until the last trumpet sounds
and blows algebra to pieces (Dickens 74).
But
Louisa can’t wait that long!
Gradgrind
had done a good job in imparting his eminently practical ways to his
children. Louisa turned her back on
sentiment. What was the use of it? She married a man she did not love. It was, after all, the practical thing to
do. What could go wrong?
Works Cited
Dickens, Charles. Hard Times. New York: Dover, 2001.
Print.
Everett, Glenn.
“Utilitarianism.” The Victorian
Web. 11 Oct. 2002. Accessed 11 Apr. 2017. Web. http://victorianweb.org/philosophy/phil1.html
Smith,
Grahame. Charles Dickens: A Literary
Life. New York: Palgrave, 1996.
Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment